Otavio Postado Setembro 13, 2018 Compartilhar Postado Setembro 13, 2018 @abadan cara é notavel que não. Bem simples de se saber só pela questão do suporte que ou paga o custo de estrutura ou paga o atendimento a meu ver $9,99/ mês não arca nem com um nem com outro. 0 Citar Fox Soluções | (011) 3090 4444 / (011) 96841-9797 | www.FoxSolucoes.com | Streaming Áudio | CentovaCast | Revendas de Streaming | Data Center Brasil EUA | | Streaming Vídeo | CastControl WOWZA | Revendas de Streaming | Data Center Brasil EUA | Link para o comentário Compartilhar em outros sites More sharing options...
abadan Postado Março 15, 2019 Autor Compartilhar Postado Março 15, 2019 Contratei um VPS com eles para ver se agilizava uma operação específica - uso intenso de disco e CPU com PHP/MySQL, Usei bem pouco, mas algumas considerações iniciais. O processador que pegamos foi este: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz Fiz o upgrade duas vezes (do menor plano "Performance" para o segundo, e depois para o de 16GB). Foi bem rápido, basicamente o tempo de reiniciar o VPS. Ao fazer login por ssh, eles indicam estes testes (com os resultados): /usr/bin/speedtest-cli --server 17386 Retrieving speedtest.net configuration... Testing from Strasmore (104.225.222.159)... Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Retrieving information for the selected server... Hosted by Windstream (Dallas, TX) [3.78 km]: 3.796 ms Testing download speed................................................................................ Download: 918.94 Mbit/s Testing upload speed...................................................................................................... Upload: 598.25 Mbit/s root@ssdnodes-1:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/x bs=1M count=2000 conv=fdatasync 2000+0 records in 2000+0 records out 2097152000 bytes (2.1 GB, 2.0 GiB) copied, 4.72055 s, 444 MB/s root@ssdnodes-1:~# echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches root@ssdnodes-1:~# dd if=/tmp/x of=/dev/null bs=1M 2000+0 records in 2000+0 records out 2097152000 bytes (2.1 GB, 2.0 GiB) copied, 2.01961 s, 1.0 GB/s Rodei este aqui também: BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: ssdnodes-1: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.15.0-46-generic -- #49-Ubuntu SMP Wed Feb 6 09:33:07 UTC 2019 Machine: x86_64 (x86_64) Language: C.UTF-8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz (4589.2 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz (4589.2 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz (4589.2 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz (4589.2 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET 23:39:08 up 5 days, 9:48, 0 users, load average: 3.56, 3.47, 2.01; runlevel ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Thu Mar 14 2019 23:39:08 - 00:03:38 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 31255843.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4134.1 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 1994.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 374656.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 111277.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 823621.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 686508.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 56281.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 3655.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3978.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 843.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 648365.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 31255843.5 2678.3 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4134.1 751.6 Execl Throughput 43.0 1994.4 463.8 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 374656.5 946.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 111277.7 672.4 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 823621.6 1420.0 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 686508.4 551.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 56281.3 140.7 Process Creation 126.0 3655.0 290.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3978.1 938.2 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 843.5 1405.8 System Call Overhead 15000.0 648365.9 432.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 685.8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Fri Mar 15 2019 00:03:38 - 00:28:14 4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 110205991.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 15842.6 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 6112.3 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 584500.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 167165.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1215693.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2596719.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 531182.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 8051.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8830.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1716.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2104669.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 110205991.5 9443.5 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 15842.6 2880.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 6112.3 1421.5 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 584500.9 1476.0 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 167165.9 1010.1 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1215693.4 2096.0 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2596719.1 2087.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 531182.1 1328.0 Process Creation 126.0 8051.9 639.0 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8830.2 2082.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1716.5 2860.8 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2104669.5 1403.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1866.6 1 Citar Link para o comentário Compartilhar em outros sites More sharing options...
abadan Postado Março 22, 2019 Autor Compartilhar Postado Março 22, 2019 Rodei o mesmo teste numa VPS Vultr da geração atual, bastante melhor em termos de CPU, com 4 cores / 8GB de memória, para comparação: ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: vultr.guest: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.15.0-36-generic -- #39-Ubuntu SMP Mon Sep 24 16:19:09 UTC 2018 Machine: x86_64 (x86_64) Language: C.UTF-8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Virtual CPU 82d9ed4018dd (5187.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 1: Virtual CPU 82d9ed4018dd (5187.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 2: Virtual CPU 82d9ed4018dd (5187.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 3: Virtual CPU 82d9ed4018dd (5187.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET 15:23:27 up 65 days, 17:41, 0 users, load average: 0.11, 0.03, 0.01; runlevel ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Fri Mar 22 2019 15:23:27 - 15:48:00 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 39382413.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4587.8 MWIPS (10.3 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 3287.5 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 601066.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 168721.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1156806.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 972580.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 70434.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 6809.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8318.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2224.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 800296.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 39382413.8 3374.7 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4587.8 834.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 3287.5 764.5 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 601066.5 1517.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 168721.4 1019.5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1156806.8 1994.5 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 972580.5 781.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 70434.0 176.1 Process Creation 126.0 6809.7 540.5 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8318.0 1961.8 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2224.4 3707.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 800296.1 533.5 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1055.8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Fri Mar 22 2019 15:48:00 - 16:12:34 4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 156213822.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 18320.8 MWIPS (10.3 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 10126.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 830453.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 232197.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1974675.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 3678143.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 757932.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 24698.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 18043.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2628.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2776089.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 156213822.0 13385.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 18320.8 3331.0 Execl Throughput 43.0 10126.8 2355.1 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 830453.1 2097.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 232197.9 1403.0 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1974675.1 3404.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3678143.0 2956.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 757932.1 1894.8 Process Creation 126.0 24698.6 1960.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 18043.0 4255.4 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2628.2 4380.4 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2776089.3 1850.7 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 2928.9 0 Citar Link para o comentário Compartilhar em outros sites More sharing options...
abadan Postado Abril 8, 2019 Autor Compartilhar Postado Abril 8, 2019 Apenas complementando o teste da SSD Nodes: como não serviu para o que eu gostaria, cancelei dentro do prazo em que devolvem o dinheiro e ocorreu tudo dentro do esperado. 0 Citar Link para o comentário Compartilhar em outros sites More sharing options...
abadan Postado Fevereiro 4, 2021 Autor Compartilhar Postado Fevereiro 4, 2021 Dois anos depois deste post, eles continuam com promoções agressivas: 32GB RAM 640GB NVMe (100% extra storage) 8 vCPU 16TB Transfer Only $99/Year Standard SSD Server 24GB RAM 300GB SSD (25% extra storage) 6 vCPU 12TB Transfer Only $69/Year 0 Citar Link para o comentário Compartilhar em outros sites More sharing options...
Guto Zen Postado Março 4, 2021 Compartilhar Postado Março 4, 2021 Em 04/02/2021 em 11:34, abadan disse: Dois anos depois deste post, eles continuam com promoções agressivas: 32GB RAM 640GB NVMe (100% extra storage) 8 vCPU 16TB Transfer Only $99/Year Standard SSD Server 24GB RAM 300GB SSD (25% extra storage) 6 vCPU 12TB Transfer Only $69/Year Pensei que tu ia voltar do passado pra dizer que deu tudo certo haha vi uma postagem de 2019 sendo escavada falei. EITA CARAMBA, DEUS apareceu na minha porta com uma VPS boa, bonita e barata! ahahaha Será que vale a pena? 0 Citar Link para o comentário Compartilhar em outros sites More sharing options...
Renato Frota Postado Janeiro 22 Compartilhar Postado Janeiro 22 Em 08/04/2019 em 16:31, abadan disse: Apenas complementando o teste da SSD Nodes: como não serviu para o que eu gostaria, cancelei dentro do prazo em que devolvem o dinheiro e ocorreu tudo dentro do esperado. Poderia detalhar por qual razão específica não te atendeu? Vi que o benchmark tem resultados inferiores a outras opções do mercado mas os preços tem um abismo de diferença então para quem não espera tanto desempenho, talvez valha a pena. (desenterrando o tópico por falta de algo mais recente no fórum sobre essa empresa) 0 Citar Link para o comentário Compartilhar em outros sites More sharing options...
Posts Recomendados
Participe da conversa
Você pode postar agora e se cadastrar mais tarde. Se você tem uma conta, faça o login para postar com sua conta.